Monday
Mar252013

Dragging Me Down

I just finished reading "Gravity's Rainbow". I wouldn't suppose that that's a particularly notable feat, but it brought to my attention something I share with the man who recommended it to me, which I'll address in short order. I'll give you a hint right now, though. It's not a love of Thomas Pynchon novels.

My father introduced me to the book a few years ago. I think that it was ostensibly a gift to celebrate the completion of my first year of university, which is still incidentally my only completed year, but I'm pretty sure that it was just an excuse to give me a book and share with me a cherished memory in doing so. It wouldn't have been the first time. That was basically the custom in my family. When nothing could be found to celebrate, books could be given without pretense, but even the most insignificant event could serve as a reminder to get a novel or something for someone in the house. 

However, this particular gift was given shortly after I'd finally solved a problem that had been growing for years. The years were the ones in which the majority of my travel stopped taking place in the back of a parent's car, and the problem was the physical burden of books. To me, travel has generally been the connective tissue of the reading process. It's the gluten. On an average childhood day, book transportation was easy. Take it in the car on the way to school. Read it when you can. Leave it in your desk when you must. Take it back in the car. Then you're back at home with a book. You always have something to read, and it always has a secure surface on which it can rest. A minimal amount of carrying. You can even leave it in the car when you're being driven to a place at which books would be an inconvenience. 

Obviously, that eventually stopped being the case. I did make attempts to deal with the situation. I remember a long English vacation during which this problem really hit me. This was in the holiday season of 2007, and I received two books for Christmas. One was "The Picture of Dorian Gray", which I squeezed into the pocket of the last pair of jeans I would ever willingly wear. I finished that in the middle of the trip and moved on to the other present, "Don Juan". That was the primary motivator for the acquisition of my first purse, but this form of carriage was still too inconvenient to allow me to bring books to destinations that didn't allow for much reading,  and I was thus unprepared for situations of unexpected inactivity. 

This was finally solved when I received an iPhone for my birthday in the months before I was given "Gravity's Rainbow". This was a bit of a hefty tome, and its transportation would have caused some strain even in the years before I started doing the majority of my reading on my phone. I planned to buy the digital version immediately, but I was dismayed to discover that there wasn't one. Since that point, I've searched the Kindle store for it after every completion of a book.

I recently searched again, and I was pleased to learn that it had finally been added. I immediately started reading it, but I quickly discovered that Pynchon was a master of a style that I generally loathe. I can't really say that it's bad. I'm pretty sure that it's exactly what he wanted to make. That's a bit of a feat in any form of art. I just really don't like reading this kind of thing. That's purely personal. But there were little discrete pockets of enjoyment. That was clear from the beginning. The occasional line that really spoke out from an intriguing way of thinking. They were brief, and they were rare, but I think that they might have been the most salient reason for which I refused to stop reading. That would have meant missing the rest of them.

This obstinacy brought to my mind an experience with my father that recurred over a period of months. I can't remember the exact year, but I'm pretty sure that it fell within the last few. My father ran a book club with some of his friends, and the book of the time was "Late Nights on Air". If memory serves, it was a Canadian novel about a radio host in one of those northern territories. You know the ones. This could basically be the book that would be written for me in one of the more personal hells. It didn't seem to delight my father either, and he'd frequently complain about it whenever he perfunctorily went off to do what should have been recreational reading. The fact that his book was exactly the kind of thing that would have brought out the same reaction in me really allowed me to sympathise with him, and I did recommend quitting on several occasions. He was resolute, though. I think that both of us were pretty sure that his club would understand. Indeed, I don't think that it was popular among many of the other members either. But his dedication went beyond that, and he did eventually finish the thing.

My experience with "Gravity's Rainbow" allowed me to fully understand that at last. The motivations might have been slightly different, and the novel he read might have been legitimately bad, but reading "Gravity's Rainbow" made me feel what I saw him experience with "Late Nights on Air". I noticed that the book was almost over today, and I was determined to enjoy the night's smoothie over a new book. The ride to the shop didn't give me enough time to finish the last section, but I stood outside it with determination as I finished the damned thing, eagerly anticipating the opening notes of the copy of "The Anubis Gates" I'd already purchased. 

Smoothies and Tim Powers, man. I'd say that the night was a success.

Monday
Mar182013

You Mean to Tell Me

 

You mean to tell me that Sir Ben Kingsley, Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire, is playing a Marvel villain who isn't the Vulture? Am I given to understand that this has actually come to pass? If this is truly so, I would like to take a moment to address an abstract personification of Ben Kingsley. I'd address the real thing, but I have no reason to suspect that he's reading this. If he is, my words go out to him too.

Sir Ben! Have you seen that image at the top of the page? This is you! Adrian Toomes is one of a select group of characters for whom you were made. By my estimation, he falls right between Gandhi and any sinister vizier type in that special category of fiction suits. Your work with the former brought you glory, and you have portrayed the latter with serious style on one occasion at least. Honestly, "Prince of Persia" might be one of the greatest video game movies of all time. That superlative really shouldn't be so narrow, but that's how things go. We'll always have "Mortal Kombat". Maybe Lara Croft can come too.

In any case, I'd hate to see you pass into an adjacent world without fulfilling that final part of your tripartite destiny. Two out of three might be fine for Meat Loaf, but you are not an operatic piece of Wagnerian rock-and-roll nostalgia. No! You are something equally great. You are an actor!

In a world where Chris Evans can play two of Marvel's most iconic heroes while Ryan Reynolds portrays every other comic character that might have fit with the old Chris Evans persona, I'm pretty sure that they'll let you have your shot at Spider-Man. 

If there's anything I can do to help you make the right decision, let me know. Perhaps some manner of cinematic rite? A ritual? A sacrifice? From what I've heard, you have done an incredible amount of horrible genre films. The intricacies of your relationship with Uwe Boll must be unfathomable. By all accounts, you have performed ably on each occasion. In support of your future portrayal of Spider-Man's most wizened adversary, I shall endeavour to watch the greatest possible number of those dubious films. I've already been planning to watch "Species". Maybe that will ease me into it.

Sunday
Mar102013

Nothing New Under the Sea

 

I don't think that I've ever watched "The Little Mermaid" in its entirety, and its one of the few entries in the Disney animated canon that I've missed in the years since my birth. I remember seeing a poster at a theatre for its forthcoming 3-D release a year ago, and that really seemed like a good chance for me to finally see it. It wasn't due to any love of the format, but I like to see things in theatres when I can. There was a brief period during which I'd specifically make a point of going to the 3-D versions of new releases, but I'm really beyond the point of noticing the differences. That's alright. At this point, I really just like the fact that this gives studios an impetus to release their old movies again. Old movies in theatres are just the total thing. I saw "The Lion King" when they released that a year ago. I'd obviously seen it on many previous occasions, but it was still great. Actually, that one song with Rowan Atkinson did look rather amazing in 3-D. I will say that.

But apparently it didn't perform too well financially. I remember hearing nothing else about the release of "The Little Mermaid", and I was beginning to think that I'd missed it somehow. I've just learned that it was cancelled because of the whole issue with the financial performance of "The Lion King". 

I also had a great time with "The Phantom Menace" when it got pushed back into theatres a year ago. I remember running into the manager of my favourite comic book shop there and learning in the ensuing months that she'd never actually seen a "Star Wars" film before that day. But apparently the plans to give the same treatment to the rest of the saga are being indefinitely postponed too. Total shame. I was fully excited for the next one because it happens to be my favourite. I know that "Attack of the Clones" tends to be unpopular, but it's incredibly hard for me to dislike a movie that contains a buddy cop car chase in the first 20 minutes. It's incredibly hard for me to avoid falling in love with it when that chase is one of flying cars. For what other reason would I be so enamoured of "The Fifth Element"?

Oh. Right. Chris Tucker.

Sunday
Mar032013

Random Acts of Boredom

I spend a fair amount of time on Craigslist in search of jobs and gigs. Sometimes I even browse around while I’m bored. On one recent occasion, I happened to find a post from someone who needed a fog machine for a film shoot. I couldn’t see any real point in doing it, but I had a fog machine and some spare time. A few people in my life offered mild admonishments and vague remarks of skepticism, believing that this act was a risk without any reward.

I do love my fog machine, and some of these people love it too. Like them, I would have been disappointed if someone had run off with it, but I just didn’t feel that that was going to happen. This was not because of some persistent faith in the good of man, nor was it motivated by some deep sense of generosity that I suddenly found within myself. I’m not really inclined to call myself an optimist; I’m generally just a jubilant cynic. I don’t think that I’m a particularly charitable individual either.

No, my man. There were two main factors in my decision to lend a fog machine to a random person. Well, there were three if one is inclined to include the fact that I own a fog machine. But the other ones were boredom and the fact that the dude who asked did not seem to be a very dishonest man.

After the shoot, the dude left town for a little while. He returned at some point towards the beginning of the week that’s just concluding as I write this. After a few false starts, we finally managed to meet again on Friday, and my fog machine was returned to me. I really didn't even have to go out of my way, for the meeting spot he suggested was right by the sandwich shop I was visiting anyway. Now the machine has replaced a broken toaster box in the role of my footrest.

Many have said that random acts of kindness will be rewarded, though this story does nothing to corroborate that assertion. However, I just wanted to note that random acts of boredom don’t always bring regret. Actually, I got to throw an old, dirty box out. I’m feeling pretty good about the whole thing.

Oh. And it was one extra thing that didn’t have to be moved out of my mother’s old house when she sold it. I just realised that. Solid times.

Anyway, the random Craigslist gentleman has my thanks for not being a jerk.

I always knew that you weren’t.

Saturday
Feb232013

Torontosaurus Rex

Good news, people! Hot Apollo is playing a show in the very near future.

Unlike many of our other shows, this one is expected to be filled with nothing but awesome rock-and-roll bands. 

This is because it is being organised by our friends in the band Beasts, who can be found at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Beasts/213050728824911?fref=ts if you're interested in discovering more about them. One of their number caught an earlier Apollo show, and he just managed to find me on Facebook a few weeks ago. Now we're playing a rock-and-roll show together, and the whole thing is going to be a great time. 

I think that there is still room for more bands in the show. If anyone knows of any who would like to come, I'd like to hear.

In any case, this is going to be a beautiful night. It's not being organised by some apathetic promoter who just takes the first 15 bands to sign up. It's being put together by musicians with shiny hair and gorgeous tunes. It's taking place in The Central at 603 Markham on the evening of the 6th of March. It's pretty close to Bathurst Station. You will love it.